In December of 2014, President Barack Obama signed the Chesapeake Bay Accountability and Recovery Act (CBARA) into law. This act requires the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to submit an annual report on federal and state funding toward environmental restoration in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Under this act, the OMB was required to include all Chesapeake Bay restoration activities that cost at least $300,000 during the first three years (2014-2017). Starting in 2018 and for every year thereafter, the report must include all Chesapeake Bay activities that cost at least $100,000.

In December of 2021, the OMB issued its sixth Chesapeake Bay Restoration Spending Crosscut, which indicates state and federal partners invested almost $1.6 billion in watershed restoration in fiscal 2021. Due to data uncertainties and constraints around time and resources, the estimates this crosscut provides may differ from the funding that ultimately supports environmental restoration. For instance, because fiscal 2021 totals were reported before the end of the fiscal year, these totals may reflect only a partial snapshot of program implementation.

Investments in restoration benefit all watershed states and support fishing, tourism, recreation, real estate, agriculture and shipping economies. An analysis from the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, for instance, found that putting the “pollution diet” in place—which is just one piece of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement—would provide annual benefits worth $129.7 billion: more than 81 times the investments cited in the 2021 Chesapeake Bay Restoration Spending Crosscut.

NOAA’s 2018 Fisheries Economics of the United States Report highlights some of these economic benefits. In 2018, for instance, the commercial seafood industry accounted for $5.7 billion in sales, $1.4 billion in income and an estimated 40,000 jobs in Maryland and Virginia. According to the National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation report, wildlife watchers spent $483 million in Maryland, $959 million in Virginia and $1.3 billion in Pennsylvania in 2011.

Federal Spending

According to the Chesapeake Bay Restoration Spending Crosscut, six of the seven agencies that make up the Federal Leadership Committee for the Chesapeake Bay—including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Homeland Security and the Interior—invested $521 million in watershed restoration in fiscal 2021. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) funding was not reflected in the Spending Crosscut; with those funds added, the investment totals $535 million in fiscal 2021. You can download more information about how these agencies allocated these funds or open the Spending Crosscut to review the caveats that may be associated with the totals federal agencies reported to the Office of Management and Budget.

Federal agency spending for watershed restoration in fiscal 2021 marked a .4% increase from the obligations of the previous fiscal year. In fiscal 2021, the EPA received an increase in funds for the Innovative Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Grants and Small Watershed Grants; and new funding for the Most Effective Basins Grants. This total is 7% less than the fiscal 2022 President’s Budget.

More than two-thirds of the $87 million U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Chesapeake Bay Program funds are directed toward state governments, local governments and other partners to help them meet the goals of the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (Bay TMDL) and the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement. The remaining Chesapeake Bay Program funds support the operation of the Chesapeake Bay Program office; the coordination of data collection and scientific research, monitoring and modeling; reporting on the quality of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem; and outreach to enhance environmental stewardship. Additional Environmental Protection Agency funds are directed toward jurisdictions through non-point source grants, pollution control grants and infrastructure assistance grants.

Under the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Natural Resources Conservation Service funds conservation easement programs and provides technical and financial assistance to farmers and other private landowners to support the implementation of conservation practices on working lands. The U.S. Forest Service provides technical assistance and project funds to promote the establishment and retention of forests on non-Forest Service lands (through the Forest Stewardship Program), in urban areas (through the Urban and Community Forestry Program) and on conservation easements on forest land (through the Forest Legacy Program). It also provides for the management of National Forests. The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Agricultural Research Service, Economic Research Service, Farm Service Agency, National Institute of Food and Agriculture and Office of the Chief Economist provide additional watershed support.

Under the U.S. Department of Commerce, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration funds scientific research in the fields of tidal and coastal fisheries and aquatic habitats (including oyster reefs) and syntheses and analyses to predict and describe ecosystem processes. The agency also funds the development of environmental science education programs, the delivery of advice and technical assistance to decision-makers, the maintenance of the Chesapeake Bay Interpretive Buoy System (CBIBS) and the preparation of coastal communities in protecting natural and manmade infrastructure.

The U.S. Department of Defense funds regional operations and maintenance that support the prevention of stormwater runoff, upgrades to wastewater treatment plants, water quality monitoring, land conservation, natural resources planning and management, and environmental outreach and stewardship. Under the U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers supports small- and large-scale studies and design and construction projects that benefit habitats and fisheries.

Under the U.S. Department of the Interior, the U.S. Geological Survey funds the generation of scientific information about fish, wildlife and their relation to water quality, habitat and land conditions. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service funds strategic conservation to connect people with nature and create sustainable watershed capable of supporting fish, wildlife and plants. The National Park Service funds the protection of habitat, the creation of public access and the promotion of tourism.

While the Department of Transportation does support restoration in the watershed, its activities did not meet the definitional limits of this crosscut and were not reported.

State Spending

The seven watershed jurisdictions—including Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia—reported investing an estimated $1 billion in watershed restoration through state programs in fiscal 2021.

State program spending for watershed restoration in fiscal 2021 was almost a 7% decrease to the obligations of the previous fiscal year. This total is 7% less than the estimated fiscal 2022 budget.

EPA Grant Funding

In addition to receiving funding from other federal agencies, in 2021 watershed jurisdictions received an estimated $35.8 million from the EPA through Section 117 of the Clean Water Act, which includes implementation and regulatory and accountability grants and specific funding directed to Watershed Implementation Plans, local governments, monitoring and sub-awards for green infrastructure and tools to aid jurisdictions in prioritizing preservation. Leveraged funds and in-kind support from grantee match totaled $35.8 million.

In 2021, watershed jurisdictions benefited from additional EPA Chesapeake Bay Program funding provided through congressionally directed grant programs. The Small Watershed Grants program distributed approximately $9 million and the Innovative Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Grants program distributed approximately $9.6 million. The Most Effective Basins Grants distributed via direct grant allocations totaled an estimated $3.9 million (included in the “State Grant Allocations” chart) plus an estimated $2.5 million were distributed for projects in Pennsylvania via a competitively awarded grant (included in the “Chesapeake Bay Directed Funds” chart). An estimated $35.7 million in leveraged funds from these three grant programs came from other federal agencies, private organizations and grantee match. Approximately $1.2 million of the Pennsylvania local government implementation grant funds were re-directed to the 2021 Small Watershed Grants for local government projects in Pennsylvania. These EPA grant funds are currently administered and leveraged by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. Download the data file to view funding for previous years.

Chesapeake Bay Directed Funds (FY2021)

These competitively awarded funds are directed to support specific programs and projects and leverage additional funding from other federal programs and private funding sources along with the required grantee match.
*Additional directed MEB funds totaling $3,854,888 were allocated to the jurisdictions as part of their Chesapeake Bay Implementation Grants (CBIG). $2,461,714 of Pennsylvania's MEB funds were awarded via a competitive grant to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation to administer in PA.

Loading Chart Loading Chart


Data (.xlsx)

EPA Grant Funding Summary (2016-2021)

Non-competitive Grant Funding represents the combined amounts allocated to the watershed jurisdictions and described more fully in the “State Grant Allocations” chart. This includes funds directed towards Most Effective Basins in each jurisdiction. Competitive Grant Funding is the combined annual amount watershed jurisdictions benefited from EPA's Small Watershed Grants and Innovative Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Grants, and, in Pennsylvania, Most Effective Basin grants (in whole dollars). These amounts are further described in the “Chesapeake Bay Directed Funds” chart. Leveraged Funding represents the grant recipient match, including in-kind support, for both competitive and non-competitive grants awarded through Section 117 of the Clean Water Act (in whole dollars) and additional funds leveraged by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. This reflects the capacity of EPA Chesapeake Bay Program grants to stimulate additional funding resources directed to the protection and restoration of the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

Loading Chart Loading Chart


Data (.xlsx)

Future Reporting

A call for funding data to support the next Chesapeake Bay Restoration Spending Crosscut will be made in the summer of 2022.