• Progress

    Progress toward this outcome is measured against a 2010 baseline, as it was at this point that jurisdictions adopted the Watershed Implementation Plans (WIPs) that outlined the pollution-reducing practices that would help them meet the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (Bay TMDL). Wetland restoration targets were included in these pollution-reducing practices.

    As of 2010, according to data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Coastal Change Analysis Program, there were approximately 282,291 acres of tidal wetlands in the watershed’s estuarine drainage area. This marks a loss of 1,566 acres since 1992.

    Between 2010 and 2015, 7,623 acres of wetlands were created or reestablished on agricultural lands. While this outcome includes a target to restore 85,000 acres of tidal and non-tidal wetlands in the watershed, 83,000 of these restored acres should take place on agricultural lands. The wetlands restored on agricultural lands between 2010 and 2015 mark a nine percent achievement of the 83,000-acre goal.

    Wetland restoration (which results in gains in wetland acreage) is tracked separately from wetland enhancement (which results in gains in existing wetland function). Wetland restoration on agricultural lands is determined through data submitted by jurisdictions to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the National Environmental Information Exchange Network (NEIEN).

    Healthy wetlands trap polluted runoff and slow the flow of nutrients, sediment and toxic contaminants into rivers, streams and the Bay. By soaking up stormwater and dampening storm surges, wetlands slow the erosion of shorelines and protect properties from floods. Wetlands also provide critical habitat for fish, birds, mammals and invertebrates, and support recreational fishing and hunting.

  • Management Strategy

    To achieve the wetlands outcome, participating partners have committed to:

    • Improving the wetland restoration reporting and tracking process;
    • Identifying barriers to wetland restoration and developing solutions to address them;
    • Increasing our technical understanding of the factors that influence restoration success;
    • Prioritizing areas for wetland restoration, with special consideration given to those projects that would benefit black ducks and other wildlife species requiring high-quality wetland habitat; benefit water quality; withstand the impacts of development and climate change; leave agricultural lands in production; lead to large acreage gains; and help partners meet multiple goals and outcomes; and
    • Expanding the involvement of local stakeholders.

    These partners will also collaborate with the work being done to achieve the black duck, environmental literacy planning, forest buffers, healthy watersheds, land use options evaluation, local leadership and protected lands outcomes.

    Monitoring and assessing progress toward the outcome will occur through acreage data submitted by jurisdictions through the National Environmental Information Exchange Network (NEIEN).

    As part of the Chesapeake Bay Program’s partnership-wide implementation of adaptive management, progress toward this outcome will be reviewed and discussed by the Management Board in August of 2017.

  • Work Plan

    Chesapeake Bay Program partners have committed to taking specific actions over the course of 2016 and 2017 to achieve the high-level approaches identified in the management strategy above.

    Completed actions from the work plan include:

    • In May 2016, the Wetland Workgroup and OpinionWorks released a report on their work to identify barriers to wetland restoration among agricultural landowners. Information collected through surveys and focus groups with landowners in South Central Pennsylvania and Maryland’s Eastern Shore showed that barriers to wetland program adoption exist in five categories: a lack of awareness, concerns for privacy, financial uncertainty, a desire for flexibility and an audience that is difficult to reach. As a result, related outreach to landowners should focus on the message, mitigate the barriers, rely on trusted messengers and prompt and support conversations between landowners and specialists.
  • Participating Partners

    The Vital Habitats Goal Implementation Team leads the effort to achieve this outcome. It works in partnership with the Water Quality and Healthy Watersheds goal implementation teams.

    Participating partners include:

    • Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (State of Delaware)
    • Maryland Department of the Environment (State of Maryland)
    • Maryland Department of Natural Resources (State of Maryland)
    • Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania)
    • Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (Commonwealth of Virginia)
    • Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (Commonwealth of Virginia)
    • Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (Commonwealth of Virginia)
    • Virginia Governor’s Office (Commonwealth of Virginia)
    • Virginia Institute of Marine Science (Commonwealth of Virginia)
    • West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (State of West Virginia)
    • West Virginia Division of Natural Resources (State of West Virginia)
    • Department of Energy and Environment (District of Columbia)
    • Chesapeake Bay Commission
    • Natural Resources Conservation Service (U.S. Department of Agriculture)
    • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
    • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
    • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    • U.S. Geological Survey
    • Biohabitats, Inc.
    • Chesapeake Bay Foundation
    • Ducks Unlimited
    • The Nature Conservancy
    • Troutman Sanders
    • Upper Susquehanna Coalition
    • Virginia Agribusiness Council