• Progress

    Working with stakeholders, the Toxic Contaminants Workgroup determined its research agenda should address the following issues: supplying information related to the safe consumption of fish and shellfish; understanding the influence of contaminants harming fish and shellfish; documenting the sources, occurrence and concentrations of these contaminants; assessing the relative risk of these contaminants and the mitigation options that could inform policies for their prevention; and gathering information on issues of emerging concern. Our baseline understanding of each of these issues differs.

    Issue: Supplying information related to the safe consumption of fish and shellfish.
    • Most of the fish consumption advisories issued in the watershed are caused by polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and/or mercury. These pollutants can come from legacy deposits, ongoing inputs and ongoing releases. Work related to the Toxic Contaminants Policy and Prevention outcome will address PCBs, while recently passed air emission controls will address mercury.
    Issue: Understanding the influence of contaminants harming fish and shellfish.
    • Research strongly suggests the influence of toxic contaminants on numerous indicators of reduced fish health (e.g., skin and liver tumors, intersex and other gonadal abnormalities, high parasite loads and opportunistic infectious diseases) and occurrences of fish kills throughout the watershed. The role of contaminants in the health of birds, reptiles and amphibians is not as well documented. There is less evidence linking contaminants to the reduced health of underwater grasses, stream invertebrates and other lower trophic level organisms.
    Issue: Documenting the sources, occurrence and concentrations of contaminants harming fish and shellfish.
    • A technical report shows PCBs and mercury are particularly problematic in the region, and are considered widespread in severity and extent. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and some herbicides are also considered widespread in extent, while dioxins, petroleum hydrocarbons, some chlorinated insecticides and some metals occur locally. Information is insufficient to determine the extent of biogenic hormones, household and personal care products, pharmaceuticals or flame retardants.
    Issue: Assessing the relative risk of contaminants harming fish and shellfish and the mitigation options that could inform policies for their prevention.
    • There is no organized information on the relative risk of different contaminant groups. However, because PCBs and mercury are widespread in extent and severity, PCBs will be the focus of the Toxic Contaminants Policy and Prevention outcome. Mercury will likely be the next pollutant addressed.
    Issue: Gathering information on issues of emerging concern.
    • Issues of emerging concern include contaminant toxicity to pollinators, microplastics and the unconventional drilling of oil and gas known as “fracking.” The baseline information on each of these is limited.
  • Management Strategy
    To achieve the toxic contaminants research outcome, participating partners have committed to:

    • Summarizing and supplying information to make fish and shellfish safe for human consumption;
    • Documenting the occurrence, concentrations and sources of endocrine disruptors and other contaminants degrading the health of fish, shellfish and wildlife;
    • Better understanding the influence of contaminants in degrading the health and contributing to the mortality of fish, shellfish and wildlife, with a focus on high-value, rare and endangered species;
    • Assessing the relative risk and options for mitigation of contaminants to inform policy and prevention; and
    • Gathering information on issues of emerging concern, including microplastics and contaminant toxicity to pollinators.

    These partners will also collaborate with the work being done to achieve the 2017 and 2025 Watershed Implementation Plans (WIPs), stream health, and water quality standards attainment and monitoring outcomes.

    Monitoring and assessing progress toward the outcome will occur through a range of environmental indicators, including the occurrence of mercury, PCBs and other toxic contaminants and the number and location of fish health consumption advisories.

    As part of the Chesapeake Bay Program’s partnership-wide implementation of adaptive management, progress toward this outcome will be reviewed and discussed by the Management Board in May of 2017.

  • Work Plan
    Chesapeake Bay Program partners have committed to taking specific actions over the course of 2016 and 2017 to achieve the high-level approaches identified in the management strategy above.
  • Participating Partners

    The Water Quality Goal Implementation Team leads the effort to achieve this outcome.

    Participating partners include:

    • Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (State of Delaware)
    • Maryland Department of the Environment (State of Maryland)
    • Maryland Department of Natural Resources (State of Maryland)
    • University of Maryland, Baltimore County (State of Maryland)
    • New York Department of Environmental Conservation (State of New York)
    • Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania)
    • Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (Commonwealth of Virginia)
    • Virginia Institute of Marine Science (Commonwealth of Virginia)
    • Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Commonwealth of Virginia)
    • West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (State of West Virginia)
    • Department of Energy and Environment (District of Columbia)
    • Chesapeake Bay Commission
    • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    • U.S. Department of Homeland Security
    • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
    • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    • U.S. Geological Survey
    • Bluewater Baltimore
    • Maryland Pesticide Network
    • Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments